Justice In Book I Of The Republic Essay -- essays research papers

The Republic of Plato begins in a similar fashion that many other Platonic dialogues begin, with that of a question. The conversation between Socrates and the aged Cephalus becomes a philosophical discussion of what advantages money has brought to Cephalus life. Cephalus replies that money has allowed him "to tell the truth and pay ones debts" (331 b). Nevertheless, Socrates believes this does not portray an accurate description of what justice is. The rest of the basic book is a discussion of the definition of justice, mainly that of Thrasymachus definition. Socrates takes his normal role as an interrogator of peoples views. The conversation focuses on justice but actually mustiness be viewed in the context of how each individual can lead the best life possible.     Thrasymachus states that "justice is simply the interest of the stronger" (338 c). In order to incite this notion, he states that people who are in power in government make laws, a nd since these people design these laws, they will serve the interests of themselves. The laws will then be the justice of the subjects, and since the ruling class could be restated as the stronger class, then justice could be stated as being in the interests of the stronger class. He goes on gain ground to say that the unjust man is stronger than the just man is, and because of that, justice is a vice while injustice is a virtue. Thrasymachus uses the example of private business to destine how ...

Changing the World in Milton’s Paradise Lost and Cavendish’s The Blazin

Changing the realism in Miltons Paradise Lost and Cavendishs The Blazing WorldIt only takes one someone or one event to change the course of the world. Eve changes the world and the course of humanity when she eats from the tree of experience in John Miltons Paradise Lost. In Margargont Cavendishs The Blazing World, the Empress single-handedly changes the world she rules for the worse, and then changes it back again. The message is that our worlds are not stiff they are ever changingfickle and subject to one event or action. Humans must realize that the actions of even one person set up produce world-altering exercises. The film Pleasantville demonstrates this idea. In the film, David, an unpopular and unhappy teenager in a post-lapsarian world, idealizes the life he sees in reruns of a black and white mid-fifties television show called Pleasantville. After a visit from a mysterious television repairman, David and his sister Jennifer are transported into the show and int o the lives of the characters Bud and bloody shame Sue. Jennifer, now cognise as Mary Sue, hates her new colorless man, and sets about to change the town of Pleasantville. Her actions and ideas lead to the introduction of passion into Pleasantville, creating a whole new world-view for these nave citizens. Mary Sues actions, at first scorned by her brother, now known as Bud, soon begin to change him, too. He leaves his unpopular, passionless existence behind, and finds the same pleasure in the discovery of passion as do the Pleasantville citizens. Mary Sue, who once scorned Bud for his love of Pleasantvilles depiction of a worry-free fifties life, now understands the virtues of that life she begins reading and goes to college. Bud and Mary Sue chan... ...erence in the world, but I have found that even one person not eating meat saves thousands of animals and hundreds of acres of rainforest, and prevents an immeasurable amount of environmental degradation. Besides, according to Milton, Adam and Eve were vegetariansMilton and Cavendish both give examples of a world cosmos changed by the actions of one person. Interestingly, Adam and Eves world and the Empresss world were perfect before they were changed. Today, our world is far from Eden or Paradise, and we are constantly bombarded with changessometimes for the better, sometimes for the worse. Our responsibility, a lesson we can take from Paradise Lost and The Blazing World, is that all of our actions have an effect. We must make sure that the effect is desirable and beneficial to all of humanity, and remember that it just takes one to make the change.

Catherine and Heathcliff in Wuthering Heights :: essays research papers

With the death of Catherine, the reader is inclined to examine the causes. Cathy herself states that Edgar Linton and Heathcliff are the direct causes, and it is instead the possibility. Finally culminating in one rather brief, yet powerful confrontation, the clashing of Edgar and Heathcliff has been an issue between the two families ever since the day that Cathy and Heathcliff went playing in the moors and got caught at the Lintons house. Calling him a gypsy and servant, Edgar Linton was disgraced by his presence. Then later, for that scoundrel to be the one that Cathy truly loves? It was just too much for Edgar. The wickedness grew and grew. When Heathcliff left, Edgar was at ease. He had Cathy, she had forgotten (or so he thought) about Heathcliff, and all was happy and merry at Thrushcross Grange. Then Heathcliff concedeed. While his motivations for leaving were good and heartfelt, his return was almost cruel for our princess Cathy. She was so used to having everything that s he could want, that she thought she could have them both. But Edgar stepped in. He finally stood up for himself and told Heathcliff never to return to Thrushcross Grange.      Its hard not to film a side here, but its also hard to choose a side. For one, we see this beautiful, happy couple, raised together as children, and soul mates from the very beginning. One is made to be of lower class, and the other is made to be higher class. This difference provides a simple yet substantial social barrier. When the two have to split, when Cathy is forced to make a decision (one which, unfortunately for Heathcliff, she has already made) the two split, and I, as a reader, am forced to choose whose side Im on.      In a novel such as this there is no right and wrong, only the lesser of two evils. Here, I have come to believe that the lesser evil is Edgar. I began to feel sorry for him, having lost both his sister and his wife to Heathcliff, whom he des pises and sees as down the stairs him on the social ladder. Even though he himself has done things that cannot be right in any sort of way, we know that he truly cares for Catherine. He tolerates her moods and her tantrums, and he provides her with things that she wouldnt have been able to get at

Hamlets Soliloquies Essays -- Essays Papers

hamlets Soliloquies The soliloquies spoken by Hamlet were directed to the audience, rather than seeming like conversations with himself. In the first soliloquy, Hamlet talks some how aggravated at life he is and that if it werent for Gods laws he would commit suicide. He is not re whollyy break of day his fathers death in this soliloquy but more his disgust for his mother for marring his uncle especially a few months after his fathers death. He then(prenominal) goes on to relieve he must remain silent. He is explaining to the audience that nothing can undo the situation to make it any better. But that isnt good luxuriant for Hamlet. Something has to be done. This soliloquy sparks an interest in the reader and provides a glimpse into Hamlets thoughts while informing the audience of the fib of his familys tribulations. In the second soliloquy Hamlet calls on the audience, the distracted globe, to hear his vow to get revenge on his uncle and to erase all from his min d pull out that of what the ghost had informed him of. The ghost, Hamlets father, had explained to him that Cl... Hamlets Soliloquies Essays -- Essays PapersHamlets Soliloquies The soliloquies spoken by Hamlet were directed to the audience, rather than seeming like conversations with himself. In the first soliloquy, Hamlet talks about how aggravated at life he is and that if it werent for Gods laws he would commit suicide. He is not really morning his fathers death in this soliloquy but more his disgust for his mother for marring his uncle especially a few months after his fathers death. He then goes on to explain he must remain silent. He is explaining to the audience that nothing can undo the situation to make it any better. But that isnt good enough for Hamlet. Something has to be done. This soliloquy sparks an interest in the reader and provides a glimpse into Hamlets thoughts while informing the audience of the history of his familys tribulations. In the second soliloquy Hamlet calls on the audience, the distracted globe, to hear his vow to get revenge on his uncle and to erase all from his mind except that of what the ghost had informed him of. The ghost, Hamlets father, had explained to him that Cl...

The Fantasy of Womens Sports in Primetime TV Slots :: Womens Issues Essays

The Fantasy of Womens Sports in Primetime TV SlotsGail, a dark, tiny, female reporter, is given the assignment of analyze Babe, one of the most talented female athletes of the twentieth century. Suggestions have sprung up that Babe was not a woman at all. These suggestions have come from beer corporations and origin right-wing opponents of a new growing opinion that men and womens sports should equally share primetime TV slots. Gail had never heard of Babe. Gail put come outs movie reviews and articles in the Arts section. Gail is a chain smoker. She employ to cut gym everyday to smoke under the bleachers with her friends. She hasnt owned a pair of sneakers since the third grade. In high school she used to think there were three kinds of kids the nerds, the jocks, and the freaks. She was some combination of the first and last group. She still held that opinion and liked to sneer at joggers in the park. She was, thus, unhappy virtually this assignment. Gail visits her parents wh o live in the suburbs. They are bohemian types. They eat a lot of gorp, have matching pottery wheels in a shed in the post yard, and would have never owned a television, but Gail begged them to get one in her freshman year of high school. When she graduated, it was the first thing that was unplugged and packed into the car, wide awake for her dorm room. She asks them if they ever heard of Babe. They say they vaguely remember a golf player named Babe. But they sneer. Golf is for the bourgeoisie, they say. Gail goes up to her old room. When she was in master(a) school all of her friends had horseback riding ribbons and trophies. She looks at her room now, imagines the walls covered in tiny ribbons, and they dissolve into a Picasso poster and the graffiti she used to write when she hadnt fallen asleep yet. She goes over to one section of the wall, runs her finger over a phrase JOCKS ARE DUMB. Gail goes back down stairs and asks her father why she never wanted to play sports. Well, h oney, he says, Youre small. And artistic. Youre not an athlete. And she thinks to herself, I didnt know what the word athletic meant until I was in the third grade. And then I threw out my tennis shoes.

The Fantasy of Womens Sports in Primetime TV Slots :: Womens Issues Essays

The Fantasy of Womens Sports in Primetime TV SlotsGail, a dark, tiny, female reporter, is given the assignment of investigating Babe, one of the most talented female athletes of the 20th century. Suggestions have sprung up that Babe was non a woman at all. These suggestions have come from beer corporations and radical right-wing opponents of a new growing depression that men and womens sports should equally share primetime TV slots. Gail had never heard of Babe. Gail writes movie reviews and articles in the Arts subsection. Gail is a chain smoker. She used to cut gym general to smoke under the bleachers with her friends. She hasnt owned a pair of sneakers since the third grade. In high school she used to think there were three kinds of kids the nerds, the jocks, and the freaks. She was some confederacy of the first and last group. She still held that opinion and liked to sneer at joggers in the park. She was, thus, unhappy about this assignment. Gail visits her parents who live in the suburbs. They are bohemian types. They run down a lot of gorp, have matching pottery wheels in a shed in the back yard, and would have never owned a television, merely Gail begged them to get one in her freshman year of high school. When she graduated, it was the first thing that was unplugged and packed into the car, ready for her dorm room. She asks them if they ever heard of Babe. They say they vaguely remember a golf player named Babe. But they sneer. Golf is for the bourgeoisie, they say. Gail goes up to her old room. When she was in elementary school all of her friends had horseback riding ribbons and trophies. She looks at her room now, imagines the walls covered in tiny ribbons, and they dissolve into a Picasso poster and the graffiti she used to write when she hadnt fallen asleep yet. She goes over to one section of the wall, runs her finger over a phrase JOCKS ARE DUMB. Gail goes back down stairs and asks her father why she never wanted to play sports. Well, hon ey, he says, Youre small. And artistic. Youre not an athlete. And she thinks to herself, I didnt know what the word athletic meant until I was in the third grade. And then I threw out my tennis shoes.

Separation of Powers in the American Democracy

Separation of powers provides our government with a system of checks and balances, a way to prevent 1 set-back from becoming too powerful. This concept was grand in the creation of our government because it prevented one central government. Our Framers wanted to avoid a government that was run by one person, or one exceedingly powerful group. In order to effectively put their theory to work, they actu eithery separated the powers between for each one branch of government.The three branches of our government consist of the legislative Branch, The decision maker Branch, and the juridic Branch. While each branch does hold some authority over the other two, they are still politically independent of one another. Let me explain further how the separation of powers works.The Legislative Branchs powers include passing all federal laws, the ability to override a death chairs veto, declaring war, enacting taxes, and it can even impeach the president. The Executive Branchs responsibiliti es include veto power over all bills, making treaties, pardon power, and it ensures all laws are carried out. Lastly, the Judicial Branch has the power to try federal cases and it can also rule that laws or executive acts are unconstitutional.As stated earlier, each branch has authorities, or checks over the other two. We know that the Executive Branch has the power to carry out laws. The Legislative and Judicial branches check over the Executive Branch in this manner because even though they are enforcing the laws, the Legislative Branch is the one with the ability to fund the laws and other executive actions, while the Judicial Branch interprets them. And, though the Legislative Branch has the power to impeach the president, a Chief Justice (a member of the Judicial Branch) sits as President of the Senate during this time. Each branch works together to ensure the other is doing what its supposed to be doing.I believe the Framers thought separation of powers was so important becaus e their goal from the ancestor was to establish a government that was unlike any other. Our Framers wanted to make sure that the government they were creating would be able to withstand itself over time. The Framers wanted to manifest they had faith (not much, but a little) in their fellow citizens by giving them the power to vote and make decisions. Giving the power to the people was the aim of our upstart government. By leaving behind countries where dictators ruled the people, and where Kings and Queens passed down authority from generation to generation, our Framers did everything they could to make sure our new government would not become what they disliked so much.Separation of powers preserves the ideas and wants of our Framers, and that is why I believe a system of checks and balances to be so important.Referenceshttp//www.usconstitution.net/consttop_cnb.htmlhttp//americanhistory.about.com/od/usconstitution/a/checks_balances.htmhttp//www.heritage.org/research/reports/200 7/12/what-separation-of-powers-means-for-constitutional-government

Are Fast Food Restaurants to Blame for Obesity?

If ever there were a newspaper headline custom-made for Jay Lenos monologue, this was it. Kids taking on McDonalds this week, suing the company for making them fat. Isnt that like middle-aged men suing Porsche for making them get speeding tickets? Whatever happened to personal responsibility? David makes an excellent point as he opens his article, but then contradicts himself by telling us that he believes McDonalds is to break up for obesity in America. It is my belief that his entire article can be invalidated in just two words personal responsibility.Each individual is responsible for the decisions that they make regarding their health or any aspect of their life for that matter. If we diabolical unshakable food for thought restaurants for making us obese, where does the blame eat up? It is regular(a) more critical for parents to recognize the need for personal responsibility, because they are not tho responsible for their health, but they are responsible for teaching thei r children how to eat right and take care of themselves as they grow up. Some might argue that if tumultuous food chains changed their arrogate size or labeled their products with nutritional information, that consumers would make better choices.If society is allowed to blame obesity on a fast food restaurant, then it will start a downward spiral with no end in sight. Are casinos to blame for gambling addictions? Are tobacco companies to blame for cancer? With this mindset, one can do anything they need and never accept responsibility for any of it. Personal responsibility must be strengthened if we are going to accomplish anything. The only one to blame for the decision to eat a cheeseburger, gamble away your income, or light up a cigarette is the person that makes the decision.We are seeing more and more frivolous lawsuits making their way through the courts and judges are awarding plaintiffs on even the most ridiculous suits. Yes, fast food restaurants are bad for our health, but so are cigarettes and alcohol. Gambling is bad for our finances. Infidelity is bad for our marriages. Do we blame the tobacco companies? Do we blame the alcohol companies? How about the casinos that lure us in and take our hard earned money, or the television and movie producers that beatify cheating?Not only does this attitude have an incredibly negative affect on our health and well-being, but it takes a horrible toll on our childrens. They are learning that there is no accountability for their actions. We can already see this in the way some children behave in public. Parents are in addition responsible for ensuring their kids are getting a healthy diet and some form of daily exercise regimen. It is all too easy to simply state I do not have time to cook my kids a healthy meal because I work too many hours to pay the bills. mayhap we should be asking ourselves, Could I save enough money by cooking healthy meals instead of eating out at fast food restaurants, which would a llow me to work fewer hours? I was very overweight as a child and yet my parents never allowed me to have fast food. They werent fixed enough at the dinner table and they allowed me to have too many snacks. Because I was always required to clean my plate, I often ate yesteryear being full. This lack of judgment on my parents part had nothing to do with any fast food restaurant. It had to do with my parents methods for raising and disciplining me.In all honesty, my parents were to blame for my childhood obesity. David seems to think that by forcing fast food restaurants to cut their portion sizes and label their meals with nutrition information, people will stop eating fast food. However, most grocery store junk food products are labeled and it does not stop people from purchasing them. Furthermore, reducing portion sizes would only cause consumers to spend more to satisfy their appetites. This does not solve the problem of obesity, and also adds to the continuing downfall of our economy and financial instability.If I want a large fry and they only have small, I am more apt to buy two or three smalls to get the alike amount of fries. While Davids article was only about the role fast food restaurants are playing in the obesity crisis, it is indicative of a much bigger problem. Americans are blaming everyone but themselves for their actions and it needs to stop. If we do not learn to take personal responsibility over our everyday decisions, and we do not begin to educate our children to do the same, then many other problems besides obesity lie in our future.

Does Technology Corrupt Society

Does technology corrupt society? (By Gordon Turtle) Does technology corrupt society? Thats a commonly asked question. If you think about it, technology c bes society more thusly it harms it. A lot of schools disallow the use of cell phones or laptops unless they argon used for school it-self. How would students communicate without them? Through the one hour to an hour and forty five minutes of lunch? What about technology used for checkup purposes. Also, technology used for electronics such as computers, lights, etc Lastly, technology used for communication, like cell phones, radios, etcWe use technology almost everywhere we use it for medical to help people get rid of diseases and injuries. It also helps doctors train better, easier, and more efficiently. If we didnt have technology then we would still be cavemen living in caves with no light, no way of surviving injuries or illnesses. If we didnt have any medical abilities the human race would have went extinct a long clip ago . Technology gave us electricity and electronics. Without technology we wouldnt have t. v. s, toys, game systems, etc If man evolved without technology then we wouldnt have come this far, we wouldnt be as smart as we are now.We also wouldnt have any way of teaching our children or other kids about how to hold out life or how to be good responsible adults. Technology also gave us communication devices such as the cellphone, house phone, computers, laptops, etc If we didnt have technology the military would have fast ways of communicating with its soldiers. Without communication we could think we are the only country on earth for all we knew. Communication devices gave us the power to talk to one another from one side of the earth to the other in seconds.Imagine a world without communication. Imagine you had to write a garner and have it read days or even months later, and then having to wait days or months for a response. Communication devices are one of the most meaning(a) pieces of technology ever made. Without them we might as well go live in a cave with the few people we know, thinking that you were the only ones that are on the earth. Thats why technology doesnt corrupt society, and that technology is what brought us to where we are today. If you think about it, technology helps society more then it harms it.

Psychology of Motivation Assignment Essay

Upon examining my inner egotism, I have realized that I have a couple of lookal excesses that I want to decrease. Firstly, I have realized that I have the aspiration to delay things and wait for the deadline to be near sooner I do my assignments, both at home and in school. Though I still meet the requirements, the whole cramming business unremarkably puts me at abundant stress after the work has been done. Another is my tendency to get easily irritated. When I am under pressure, I hate people bothering me, which sometimes transmit to misunderstandings between me and my siblings, friends and classmates.On the other hand, I have only one dominant behavioral deficit that I want to overcome and that is my tendency to notice silent even if I know that my idea is better than what has been presented. I am not a very assertive person and I usually accept what others would have to say instead of insisting mine. The most plausible cause of my first identified behavioral excess is the reward that I am getting in the form of high scores all time I do my assignments near the deadline.I have noticed that my mind plant best when under pressure. When I was still in my elementary years, I used to do my assignments immediately upon receipt of the advice coming from my teacher. Unfortunately, the results are not as good as those projects that I accomplish near the deadline. I have also noticed that my ideas are incredibly free flowing when I am under pressure. The high academic ratings that I earned out of the cramming business have reinforced me to start doing my assignments near the set deadlines.Unfortunately, now that I am already in my college years, the projects that I need to accomplish started to pile up and the stress I experience out of the situation is sometimes hard to fend for physically as it drains my energy. On the other hand, the second behavioral excess that I have identified above is possibly caused by stress. It is connected with my tendency to de lay accomplishing projects, thus, when in extreme pressure, I tend to nag and easily get irritated. This is unhealthy for me as far as my relationship with my siblings, classmates and friends are concerned.If is put out to do this, I will loose my friends and my closeness with my siblings will be affected as well. I really need to decrease this negative behavior by controlling my temper. Likewise, the deficit that I have identified to be overcome is possibly caused by the way our parents reared us. As a child, I remembered that I was not given much freedom to express my self and let my opinions on certain things be heard. If ever I do some deviations, I get scolded. These negative experiences have led me to accept what other people have to say instead of insisting on what I believe.Using the self control program, I think the most efficient strategy to make myself commit to this aim of controlling my behavioral excesses is to tell others and make them aware of my intentions. By doin g this, I will be obliged to religiously follow my commitment. I will make a daily schedule with realistic timelines so that I will have clear targets and ensure prioritization of important things. By accomplishing the projects and things to do according to the planned schedule, I could be stress free and thus, avoid getting irritated immediately. In character I fail to meet a certain target, I will abstain from attending a scheduled sport activity.This will serve as my punishment for having failed to meet my goal. On the other hand, I will treat myself to a new book in case I consistently meet my targets. I will monitor my progress on a monthly basis until such time that my aim becomes a habit. In overcoming my behavior deficit, I will start joining groups where exchange of ideas is frequent. My target is to express my opinion at least once in every topic being discussed. The reward that I will gain here will be in the form of self fulfillment. The only obstacle that I have seen here is fear of rejection but I think the reward is worth the risk.

Honesty in Pride and Prejudice and A Doll’s House Essay

Henrik Ibsens A Dolls House and Jane Austens Pride and Prejudice are set in similar time period and feature protagonists who go through different struggles, exactly whose themes have some overlap. Honesty is a theme that is played place in both stories resulting in opposite consequences for the protagonists. The power of honestness target either hurt or enhance lives. The righteousness means ruination in Nora and Torvalds marriage in A Dolls House whereas the accuracy brings Elizabeth and Darcy together in Pride and Prejudice. Honesty in both potent and female protagonists is evenly important in forging good relationships between each other.In both stories, strong honesty shapes the two couples fates. Both novels commence with the dishonesty of female protagonists one who has lied to her husband for eight years and one who keeps denying to herself her feelings closely a man. Nora, the female protagonist of A Dolls House, seems happy about her marriage to Torvald. She does non seem to mind Torvald treating and patronizing her like a doll. How perpetually, Ibsen foreshadows Noras dishonesty with the very first word on the first rapscallion of the play Hide the Christmas tree away(1), and Noras action is eating macaroons and lying to Torvald about it.She also acts like an impulsive and dependent child to Torvald as if she is hiding something, which is her knowledge of her business details debt that she acquired to loan in order to save Torvalds life. Elizabeth, the female protagonist of Pride and Prejudice, is a young, intelligent woman whose virtue and independence enable her to overcome the bounds of social class and harsh society. However, her course of making rash and imprudent judgment often leads to her ill luck she prejudged Darcys personality as the most proud and conceited (11) after however meeting him once.She hated everything about him based only on her prejudgment. As a result, she was not able to admit her inner affection toward him and kept denying her true feelings about him. Although Darcy proposes to Elizabeth in a most honest and gentle modality though indirectly insulting her family and status Elizabeth replies only with lies From the very beginning, from the first moment,fullest belief of your arrogance, your conceit, and your selfish disdain,which succeeding events have built so immovable a dislike and I had not known you a month before I felt that you were the last man in the world whom I could ever be prevailed on to arry (166). Elizabeths dishonesty to Darcy and to herself is the major obstacle to escort each other. Fortunately, Elizabeths mind starts to change as she learns about the accuracy of Darcy, but on the other hand, when Nora decides to reveal the truth, only disaster awaits her. Although Nora and Elizabeth both started as dishonest, they both decide to reveal and admit the truth that they must affront. Nora has been hiding the truth for several years from her husband because Torvald disallows anyone to make debt.However, she decides to test the truth of her husbands love by revealing the truth of herself. Nora, who has been a doll of Torvald, is no longer a little sky-lark chirruping or a pretty little pet as her husband calls her. Her decision to confront the truth shows how ambitious, determined, and courageous a woman she is. Elizabeth, who has been trapped by her own prejudice, finally awakens and becomes honest to herself she admits that she loves and feels compassion for Darcy.How despicably have I acted prided myself on my discernment how humiliating is this discovery Had I been in love, I could not have been more wretchedly blind but vanity, not love, has been my folly Till this moment I never knew myself. (178-179) When Elizabeth acknowledges the truth about herself, her prejudgment vanishes. She allows herself to look back at what she has done and realizes her mistake in the relationship with Darcy. Both Nora and Elizabeth have changed since the begi nning of the novel. They discover the importance of honesty in marriages and relationships despite experiencing different results.The two contrasting consequences not only depend on Nora and Elizabeths honesty, but also depend on their spouses. Nora believed that Torvald would understand her dishonesty because she trusted his love. However, when Torvald learns about the blackmail, Nora and Torvalds marriage falls apart Miserable womanwho was my pride and joy a hypocrite, a liar, worse than that, a criminal they people might even think I was the one behind it all, I who pushed youIve taken such good care of youdone to me? youll go on living hereyou will not be allowed to bring up the children, I cant trust you with them (75-76).In this moment of truth, not only Nora but also Torvald shows his true color. In order to keep his pride and reputation, he makes Nora live with him and pretends that they are married. Even worse, when Torvald receives the IOU letter back, he curtly hides his true color, as if nothing has happened after he had said horrible words to Nora We are saved, Nora I forgive you everything. I know you did what you did because you loved me. (77) Nora understands the truth of Torvald after revealing the truth of herself. She learns that Torvalds love is not genuine, and their marriage has been fake and artificial.Nevertheless, honesty in Pride and Prejudice empowered Elizabeth and Darcys relationship. Although Darcys first proposal to Elizabeth was not successful, he tries once more as he writes a letter with honesty. may be offensive to yours, I can only say that I am sorryI believed it on impartial conviction, as truly as I wished it in reason forgive me, It pains me to offend you (169-170). In this honest letter, he apologizes for the past arrogance and misinterpretation in Jane Elizabeths sister and Bingleys Darcys intimate booster dose relationship.In the relationship between Elizabeth and Darcy, honesty enables them to understand each other and to succeed in the goal of marriage. Neither Nora nor Elizabeth was able to accomplish a mightily and lasting connection with their spouses until they knew who they were themselves, and until they learned the truth about their prospective spouses. Two male protagonists opposite reactions and attitudes in honesty shaped the fate of Nora and Elizabeth separation and amaze in relationships. Honesty makes Nora and Torvalds relationship to decline but Elizabeth and Darcys relationship to succeed.Honesty does not always triumph it can also turn a situation. In A Dolls House and Pride and Prejudice, both women learn that they also have to be honest with themselves, not only with other people. They also see the ultimate consequences in relationship will also depend on their spouses, not only on herself. Although both women were equally honest, perhaps Elizabeth was more fortunate than Nora in her choice of spouse and in finding the opportune moment to be honest, which allowed h er to forge a fulfilling and sustained marriage.

Church to Connect Essay

Our future is not to be found in our preservation but in our investment (19). The best way to pretend the future is to create it (20). Fewer people are attending church because of the diminishing influence of Christ on the church itself. We equated being a frank citizen with being a good Christian. We lived without persecution and soon found ourselves without conviction. We didnt lose America we gave her away In our panic and powerlessness we turned to political marrow to seek to regain what we once had by dint of spiritual awakening .Yet as a moral majority we could not accomplish what God could through Gideons few (28). Once we were called Christians by an unbelieving cosmea and now we call ourselves Christians and the world calls us hypocrites. Is it possible that it wasnt the nation that was becoming hazardously secular but the church? We were neither relevant nor transcendent. We have become, in the worst of ways, religious. We are the founders of the secular nation (29). The church became a refuge from the world rather than a force in the world. Predictability and stability became dominant themes.The religious doctrine shifted from a church on a mission to a church that back up missions (30). How could we ever think that the Christian faith would be safe when its central metaphor is an instrument of death? It is not a coincidence that baptism is a wet grave depicting death and resurrection. It is no less significant that the ongoing ordinance of the Lords Supper is a reminder of sacrifice. How did we ever develop a safe theology from such a dangerous faith? (33) Institutions preserve culture while movements create culture (34).For years the bulk of American Christians who were commit to missions could only participate through giving and praying. Today, the call to crosscultural ministry doesnt even require going it just requires staying with a purpose (45). Where once the pagan lived in the country and the danger of the city was to be Christian ized now Christians tend to live away from the cities and view the urban dweller as the true pagan (46). Gideon was focused on mass God was focused on momentum (69). Its hard to believe that a movement born of visionaries and dreamers would become dominantly known for its traditions and rituals (138). just now because a person cannot read doesnt mean she lacks the capacity to learn. Ones present condition is not an indication of potential, but of development (211). III. spectacular POINTS/ANALYSIS 1. The Need for the Church to Connect with this Generation The author speaks about how in the past 40 years communities have changed dramatically yet numerous local churches have stayed the same. This explains the irrelevancy and bankruptcy of the church in regards to being salt and light and functioning as agents of change for culture.Even the way the gospel is communicated has to be changed if we are going to reach this present generation. One of the dramatic changes in our environmen t is the shift from words to images. To do church in a way that is entirely textdriven is the kiss of death. People dont read, they simply observe. Beyond the emergence of a postliterate society, we have a culture raised on entertainment (17). As McManus states, While not many churches perform their services in Latin today, our language, style, music, and methods are pretty much Latin to the unchurched population (81).